Sport Hunting?
by Ron Spomer
There is nothing sporting about sport hunting. Harassing and killing animals for some kind of cheap thrill is sick!
Well, yes. But who says sport hunting means killing wantonly for cheap thrills? I sure don’t. And neither do millions of other serious, dedicated, respectful conservation hunters.
Ah, “conservation hunters.” That’s another example of trying to find words to describe what “Sport Hunting” was originally designed to mean. It has never meant a frivolous game or a contest to see who can score more points. Sport hunting means boundaries, rules, regulations, and limitations. It describes responsible, controlled, limited hunting to differentiate it from market hunting and poaching. Just the opposite definition of what many think.
The phrase arose in the late 19th century when Americans were free to shoot, capture or exterminate just about any wild thing. Rats, elk, chestnut trees, canvasbacks, cougars, ginseng root, ivory-billed woodpeckers, passenger pigeons… Wild things were free for the taking. So of course people took too much. It was “me first”. Get yours before it’s gone.
And much of it was soon gone. Carolina parakeets and passenger pigeons were exterminated. Bison and turkeys were dwindling to near extinction. Egrets, herons, pronghorns, cypress trees and even whitetail deer were dwindling to scarcity. Forests were being razed, prairies plowed under, wetlands drained.
And who do you suppose rose in opposition? Hunters. Yes, concerned hunters calling for sport hunting. This meant restraint. Closed seasons. Limited harvest. Sport hunting meant management of wild resources so they could replenish annually. It meant adhering to fair chase tactics. No spotlighting. No punt guns. No chasing with motorized vehicles. Restricted harvest meant Nature could sustain healthy wildlife numbers within protected, intact ecosystems indefinitely.
Those concerned hunters concocted a sporting code of hunter ethics, self-imposed limitations on where, when, what, how, and how much game could be taken. The new sport hunters opposed the shooting does, fawns, cubs, and hens. They insisted it was non-sporting to hunt deer at night with spotlights. They were against hunting during spring nesting periods. They legislated against wanton waste of meat, poison-tipped arrows, fully automatic firearms, and oversized scatterguns firing into vast flocks of birds. They even had the temerity to suggest shooting a roosted turkey out of a tree was unsporting!
And they didn’t stop at that. Over the decades they demanded sport hunters shoot no more than ten quail or three pheasants per day, one deer per season, one moose every ten years, or one bighorn sheep per lifetime! Whatever limitations and restrictions required to sustain wildlife abundance were proposed and advanced by sport hunters.
To police these rules and fund wildlife management, sport hunters taxed themselves through license and tag fees. They used those funds to hire biologists and game wardens. And yet they were still not satisfied, so they started independent, conservation organizations that raised additional millions and pushed business and government toward ever more and better wildlife and habitat management. Ducks Unlimited, National Wild Turkey Federation, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, Izaak Walton League, Pheasants forever, Ruffed Grouse Society…
It worked. And still works. Sport hunters — not poachers, market hunters or even subsistence hunters — have saved numerous wildlife species from extinction, enhanced and restored them to abundance. Game species have bounced back and even improved in genetic quality. In just the past 40 years new world-record antlers and horns for nearly every recognized big game species and subspecies in North America have been collected. Many of those have come in the last 20 years. Forget about “trophy hunters” depleting the gene pool.
Sport hunting is governed by rules and limitations. What does that remind you of? A sport, perhaps? Like “no stepping out of bounds? No hitting below the belt? No head butting?” Rules and limits are are what differentiate games from tribal warfare, from all-out, no-holds-barred exploitation. Instead of throwing stones at our neighbors, we throw them past batters. Instead of choking our rivals to death, we pin them to the matt for three seconds. Instead of killing wildlife indiscriminately, sport hunters severely restrict and limit their harvest.
And that is why sport hunting is called sport hunting. Not because it’s a frivolous, meaningless game, but because it’s a vital, essential life-and-death interaction with Nature which sport hunters intend to maintain, sustain, and perpetuate.
# # #